This is my third and probably final post about hell. (See What no one talks about – Christian musings on hell and Mortality (or Hell #2)
As I said at start, it was my daughter Ellyanne who challenged me on this topic with her question, “How can I love a God who says, ‘Love me or burn forever’?”
Then she died, and ‘what comes after’ became a compelling subject for me.
I’m not trying to make a scholarly argument; no painstaking, verse by verse defense. I’m just showing my own process. It’s meant to start someone else’s journey, be an invitation to read scripture with a mind open to a new possibility and see where God takes you.
With that said, it’s time for some disclaimers and clarifying of terms.
Jesus talks about hell a lot, so no, I’m not arguing that it doesn’t exist.
But he also uses a lot of “death” and “destruction” language.
Why both?
Maybe, because both are true?
I’ve been reading arguments that there are two parts to life-after-death: the part that happens immediately, and then the final judgement, resurrection, and new heaven and earth.
In the first part, right after death, we either go to heaven (“Today, you will be with me in Paradise”) or hell (as in Jesus’ parable of the rich man in ‘torment’ seeing Lazerus with Abraham).
At the end of time will come the judgement and then – for the saved – resurrection and new heaven and earth.
For the unsaved – death, because they never received eternal life.
It makes sense to me based on my reading of scripture. God did not give us a clear outline of what to expect. He could have. But he chose not to. Instead he gave us parables, dreams, visions, and a scattering of images and references.
We’ve taken Jesus’s references to “eternal punishment” to mean conscious eternal torment. But it really doesn’t have to mean that, and in fact I don’t think that’s what any of his contemporaries thought. Peter seems pretty clear, claiming that the ‘ungodly’ will ‘burn to ashes’ like Sodom and Gomorrah (2Pe 2:6). The sense is of finality, not ongoing burning.
“Eternal Punishment” can easily mean death, which is eternal and is punishment – especially when the alternative is a glorious, glad, resurrected life with God.
I think when the unsaved are thrown into the lake of fire, they are consumed – exactly the way anyone would be if thrown into a raging hot fire while mortal. Or, if the fire is not literal, it’s meant to be a picture of death, rather than ongoing torment.
I think it is safe – and preferable – to assume that heaven (Paradise) and hell are both temporary, and that only the saved have eternal life.
It seems to me to make the most logical sense out of the seeming contradictory verses, and fits much better with the character of Jesus and the God who is his father.
I started these posts on hell because of Ellyanne. Because I hate that she had so much fear, and that I had no good answers.
I did get a chance to talk to her about what I was learning. I was all excited, as if I was giving her some sort of gift.
But she just shrugged, “Well, I mean, it makes sense.”
For all her struggles with God, she had beat me to a better view of hell. Logically, she just couldn’t accept any other option.
Not from a Father God.


